Pos singles dating site
The problem with the arrangement was that they offered software and database assistance but they didn’t exactly keep a tab on the information that was taken from the website.So in effect people could have taken any detail and information from the database.It also opens a door for discrimination and that in turn can result in the plaintiff suffering from further humiliation.The anonymity clause undertaken by the court was to the point and hence this case was known as Doe vs. This is something that the sites should have done themselves.The lawyer of the plaintiff went on to say that his client was not aware of that the defendant here was engaged in such activities and it was a gross violation of the right. He simply said that the action performed by the defendant in this instance was like if someone was putting their profiles on Jdate and seeing that somehow their profiles have come up on Christian Mingle and that too without their knowledge.The bigger problem was that these details also included their medical condition that they mentioned in their profiles for This company was known to run a number of different websites among which was one.
is a herpes dating site and is also known as one of the most popular ones among them.At first the plaintiff did agree that after the completion of the registration process he was provided with a link.It was a link which was more like an enquiry about the candidate.All these information were of those people who were registered with Successfulmatch.com, so anyone whose profile registered with the site was vulnerable.So when the first court papers were served to the site it was clearly stated that the website offered 100% confidentiality and advertised it in that same light.